Fishing

Contrary to industry claims, bottom trawling undermines food security

New global research finds industrial bottom trawling to be diverting nutritious fish to export markets, and deepening food insecurity in the communities that depend on the sea most

31/03/26
Words by Eva Cahill
Photography by Olivier Dugornay

Bottom trawling undermines local food security, nutrition and livelihoods in coastal communities, according to a new global study.

The destructive fishing practice involves towing nets to catch fish and other marine species living on or close to the seabed. It accounts for over a quarter of total global marine fish catches, and a commonly sold narrative is that the practice is critical to feed a growing population.

However, this new report finds that bottom trawling reduces the availability and accessibility of fish to coastal communities, and diverts good quality, nutritious fish to global markets.

The research was led by fisheries researcher Dr Anna Schuhbauer, Scientific Consulting, and Professor Ussif Rashid Sumaila, fisheries economist at Fisheries Economic Research Unit, University of British Columbia and conducted in partnership with the Transform Bottom Trawling (TBT) Coalition and marine conservation NGO Blue Ventures.

Researchers analysed nine case studies across Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and the Americas. They found a clear, displacement pattern whereby industrial trawlers replace small-scale fisheries and destroy local ecosystems.

These degraded habitats mean local, small-scale coastal communities face declining quality of available fish, the diversion of their food source to export markets – and subsequently the erosion of informal food-sharing systems relied on by elders and low-income households for adequate nutrition.

Dr Anna Schuhbauer, fisheries researcher said: “In Goa that has meant declining access to affordable seafood that families have long been dependent on. Meanwhile, salmon remains central to the Yukon‑Kuskokwim Delta’s Indigenous communities in Alaska, yet industrial trawl fisheries continue to damage marine habitat and contribute to salmon decline through by-catch.”

France bottom trawling

Researchers said by focusing narrowly on volume and export markets, fisheries policies are overlooking a central reality: food and nutritional security depends on access, equity and nutrition, not simply the amount of fish landed.

In this case, food insecurity can worsen even when total fish production appears stable.

Women who dominate the fish processing, drying, trading, and retailing industry in many Global South and Indigenous contexts, are also acutely affected by this problem.

The expansion of industrial bottom trawling frequently shifts landings away from local beaches and small ports toward industrial landing sites, export-oriented processing facilities, or transhipment hubs.

Women in Ghana, India and Indonesia, who depend on nearshore landings for processing and trade, are losing access to raw fish, experiencing loss of income and facing financial greater financial precarity, meaning reduced household food security.

However, enforcement can be effective in combatting this problem.

For instance, one of the report’s clearest findings comes from southern Brazil, where enforcement of a 12-nautical-mile trawling exclusion zone, rather than narrower 3–5 nm limits, has meant demersal fish stocks have dramatically rebounded. In turn, this has improved access to affordable local protein, and reduced conflict between industrial and small-scale fleets.

Protecting food security, the report finds, requires moving beyond just production-focused fisheries management to policies that prioritise nutritional equity, livelihoods and food sovereignty.

Their findings recommend integrating food security into fisheries policies, with decision-making that includes small-scale fishers and recognises the gendered impacts of bottom trawling on coastal communities.

The report also calls for restricting the expansion of bottom trawling, enforcing exclusion zones, and redirecting subsidies to support small-scale fishers.

Professor Sumaila said: “The key question is not how much fish is caught globally, but who actually benefits from it. Bottom trawling may deliver high headline catch figures, but it often does so at the expense of access to affordable, nutritious fish for coastal communities, particularly in regions where fish is a dietary cornerstone.”

Click here for more from the Oceanographic Newsroom

Words by Eva Cahill
Photography by Olivier Dugornay

Printed editions

Current issue

Back issues

Enjoy so much more from Oceanographic Magazine by becoming a subscriber.
A range of subscription options are available.